Vorbis Opus Mp3 Comparison
For almost 20 years SoundExpert is the home for innovative audio measurements and research. Newly developed listener-centric audio metric combines instrumental measurements with listening assessments and helps to perform both more efficiently.Since 2001 more than 10 000 volunteers participated in distributed blind listening tests on Soundexpert website.
Sound quality ratings of 100+ codecs were computed thanks to their time and efforts. You can still.Recently we developed a new method for instrumental measurements of audio equipment. It is based on the new audio metric and helps to examine technical performance of an audio device in great detail. Furthermore all audio devices can be grouped according to their sound signatures. The measurement procedure was fine-tuned during two years of beta-testing with 30+ portable devices. Now it is mature enough for production environment.
First few tested players can be found on page.I hope this new audio metric will attract more audio engineers and enthusiasts as it opens new field of audio research where objective and subjective are not separated anymore. Further advance in the research requires many more different audio devices to be tested - a serious challenge for our non-commercial research project. Fortunately portable players are good test subjects for this research, even the old ones. That's why I need some help from our volunteers again. If you have such old/previous/ex digital portable audio player or a smartphone that was marketed as 'HQ audio inside', if it is fully functional but not in use anymore, please, consider donating it to SoundExpert.
Its df-measurements will appear on the portable players page. Then it will be either kept for research purposes or sold off supporting the project additionally (or given away to some music lover if it can't be sold for some reason). I'm going to refund your postal expenses but can't confirm this right now. Please, for further arrangements.M anufacturers of portable devices can order df-measurements for their products.
The cost of the work will be equal to retail price of the device. I will buy it and perform standard df-measurements. If you decide I will not publish results during a year.Today building a comprehensive audio quality map of various audio devices on the market can be done by ourselves - audio consumers.
And it's not hard indeed. In the end this will free up some time for listening and discussing Music, not technology )).Thanks,Serge SmirnoffSoundExpert Founder2001-2019 SoundExpert.
's.No support requests - This is not a support forum! Head to or for support or help. Looking for a distro? Try.No spamblog submissions - Posts that are identified as either blog-spam, a link aggregator, or an otherwise low-effort website are to be removed.No memes, image macros or rage comics - Meme posts are not allowed in. Feel free to post over at instead.Reddiquette, trolling, or poor discussion - asks all users follow Top violations of this rule are trolling, starting a flamewar, or not 'remembering the human' aka being hostile or incredibly impolite.Relevance to community - Posts should follow what the community likes: GNU/Linux, Linux kernel itself, the developers of the kernel or open source applications, any application on Linux, and more. Take some time to get the feel of the subreddit if you're not sure!.Spamming self-promotion and surveys - Submitting your own original content is welcome on, but we do ask that you contribute more than just your own content to the subreddit as well as require you to interact with the comments of your submission.
Additionally, surveys are not allowed.No misdirecting links, sites that require a login, or URL shorteners - In short: if your link doesn't go right to the content it will be removed.No NSFWGNU/Linux is a free and open source software operating system for computers. The operating system is a collection of the basic instructions that tell the electronic parts of the computer what to do and how to work. Free, Libre and open source software (FLOSS) means that everyone has the freedom to use it, see how it works, and change it.GNU/Linux is a collaborative effort between the GNU project, formed in 1983 to develop the GNU operating system and the development team of Linux, a kernel. Opus excels at quality audio from low bitrates. The default is 96kbps and it does sound very good to my ears at that rate.I have most of my music ripped from CDs into flac format for playing at home, but have transcoded much of it to opus on an SD card for use in my work laptop and I find the quality to be fine. I haven't done any ABX testing between the two, but opus sounds great to me at its default bitrate.One thing to note though is that it will up-sample any 44.1k recordings to 48k. From what I've read, its up-sampling algorithm is really good.
I tested Opus, Vorbis, and MP3 for an audiobook last October. Opus is the most efficient of the three by far, especially when it comes to speech.However, there was a problem that some might consider small but which matters to me. The audiobook I encoded was a BBC radio drama which in addition to speech had short segments of music. Sometimes speech would start as stereo and switch to mono (and a different quality) mid-sentence, a very noticable change. I believe this is due to how Opus uses two different codecs for different materials and detects the best codec to use for different parts of the audio.I probably could've just forced the encoder to use only stereo or mono, but that would've kinda defeated the purpose of using a codec that can choose the best quality for each segment of audio. Vorbis and Opus were pretty much identical above 96kbpsDo you remember which test was that?
From the Hydrogenaudio forums puts Opus at a significant advantage at 96Kbps, and my guess is that the gap would only be bridged at bitrates way larger than that, enough for both codecs to be transparent. But for me the most important metric is how low the bitrate can go for a given transparency level, and I've found Opus much better than Vorbis and MP3 at that.But any project that includes mainly speech, low-medium quality music, or streaming (as I just mentioned) would be perfect for Opus.The interesting thing about Opus is that it switches on the fly between Speex SILK (low-bitrates) and CELT (high-bitrates).
So it should work quite well regardless of the mix of audio types. The major disadvantage is decoding complexity and lack of hardware support. When evaluating a audio codec there are a few things to consider. efficiency (perceptual quality at bitrate x). latency (important for communication). software support.
hardware support. complexity (how well does it run on old hardware)Opus scores good on efficiency and latency, bad on software support and very bad on hardware support. If you're interested in good quality you can pick any codec and just increase the bitrate until you hit transparency (indistinguishable from source), or just use a lossless codec like flac.The niche opus currently occupies is WebRTC for VoIP. The are other use cases, for example I use opus on my chromebook because it only has a 16 gb ssd. But that's a really uncommon scenario and I had to write many bug reports. If you want so send some files to your fiends, chances are they can't play opus.
Mp3 at 192 kbps works well enough, disk space is not really a concern for most people these days. There is allso AAC which is almost as efficient as opus but has much better software/hardware support.So pick your priorities and choose accordingly.:). Not on their Ipod, and Android 5 market penetration is.
Ipods LOL, what year is this? Android 5+ is growing rapidly, but any android device can play them with Firefox, VLC or Rockbox apps installed. Not to mention the various other downloadable media apps for iOS and Android. Desktop wise Most people have chrome or Firefox and maybe even VLC. As for favorite media players Foobar2000 works with opus just fine as does VLC.Opus has three modes you can force any one of them at encoding, voice silk, musiccelt or hybrid.
Mp3 Reviews
Hybrid is used in the mid range bitrates until it gets to a certain bitrate and defaults to celt only. AAC or Vorbis can't hold up at 32kbs and not at anywhere near CD quality. The listening test show that even for music Opus is superior. Opus gives superior quality with more flexibility and robustness. Opus has been sorted as it has been supported in the browsers for quite some time. If you're interested in good quality you can pick any codec and just increase the bitrate until you hit transparency (indistinguishable from source), or just use a lossless codec like flac.Having a lower bitrate for the same level of transparency is still quite useful.
Mp3 Comparison Chart
I switched the transcoding format for my Android devices from MP3 V2 to Opus 128, and saved up about 40% space with no noticeable quality loss. Disk usage doesn't matter that much for the originals on my PC, which are FLAC or high-bitrate MP3, but it makes a huge difference when you have limited space on a phone.bad on software supportI agree that the number of players that support Opus is still not good, but I disagree that it is a deal breaker: how many players do you use at once? At most one for each platform. If there are good quality players on every platform that support it, so that you can pick one that you find good, then it isn't that much of a problem. On Windows there is Foobar2000, and VLC, on Linux pretty much anything, on Android any respected third-party player but Poweramp (hopefully Google Music soon).
Vorbis Opus Mp3 Comparison Chart
It's just iOS that does really badly.There is allso AAC which is almost as efficient as opus but has much better software/hardware support.There is some value in supporting open codecs, if Opus is to take over the world we can help a bit:).